Clinical trial

Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Mesylate in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

N Engl J Med · 2002147 patients
Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347:472-480
Study type
Clinical trial
Design
Multicentre, open-label (unblinded) randomised trial
Sample size
147 patients
Source
N Engl J Med · 2002

In plain words

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is a type of tumour that does not respond well to ordinary chemotherapy. In this study, people with advanced disease were given the oral drug imatinib, which blocks a protein (KIT) that is important for the growth of these tumours. In more than half of the patients the tumour shrank, and in about another quarter the disease stayed stable. Side effects were usually mild to moderate (such as swelling, diarrhoea and tiredness), but about 5% of patients had bleeding in the gut or inside the abdomen.

Key results

79 patients (53.7%)
Partial response
No patient had a complete response
41 patients (27.9%)
Stable disease
7 patients (4.8%)
Response not evaluable (for technical reasons)
20 patients (13.6%)
Early resistance to imatinib
Median duration of response not yet reached
Duration of response
After a median follow-up of 24 weeks from onset of response
No significant difference in toxic effects or response
Comparison of the two doses
400 vs 600 mg per day
Drugs in this study:Imatinib (Gleevec)

Treatment arms and regimens

1Imatinib 400 mg

Imatinib mesylate orally, 400 mg per day. Other dosing and schedule details in the full text.

2Imatinib 600 mg

Imatinib mesylate orally, 600 mg per day. Other dosing and schedule details in the full text.

Source of the regimen details: Abstract of the paper

Doses are given for the information of specialists, as in this study’s protocol, and are not a prescription. Every drug must be prescribed by the treating physician for the individual patient.

Study population

Patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). Based on the abstract's conclusion, the tumours were unresectable or metastatic. Other inclusion criteria are not given in the abstract and are in the full text.

Endpoints

Assessment of antitumour response, and of drug safety and tolerability. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in a subgroup of patients. The abstract does not divide endpoints into primary and secondary.

Safety and side effects

Treatment was well tolerated, although mild to moderate oedema, diarrhoea and fatigue were common. Gastrointestinal or intra-abdominal haemorrhage occurred in about 5% of patients. No significant difference in toxic effects was seen between the two doses. The rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events is not reported in the abstract.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

This study showed that inhibiting the KIT pathway with imatinib can produce durable objective responses in more than half of patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic GIST. This finding matters for tumours resistant to conventional chemotherapy and established targeted therapy as a promising approach. The two doses of 400 and 600 mg per day did not differ significantly in response or toxicity. The current status of approvals and clinical guideline recommendations should be checked separately, as the abstract does not mention them.

Limitations

According to the abstract, the study was open-label and follow-up after onset of response was short (median 24 weeks), so the median duration of response had not yet been reached. In this report, the study was not designed or reported for a precise comparison of the two doses or of survival. 7 patients (4.8%) could not be evaluated for response for technical reasons.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.