Observational studyKidney cancer

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–Targeted Agents: Results From a Large, Multicenter Study

JCO · 2009645 patients
Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, et al. JCO. 2009. 27:5794-5799
Study type
Observational study
Study name
Heng et al. 2009
Design
Multicentre cohort study (3 cancer centres in the USA and 4 in Canada) to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression and bootstrap validation
Sample size
645 patients
Source
JCO · 2009

In plain words

This study looked at the records of 645 patients with advanced kidney cancer who had been treated with targeted drugs against VEGF. The researchers found six clinical and laboratory signs that were linked with a shorter life, including anaemia (low red blood cells), high calcium, poor general fitness (performance status), and high neutrophil and platelet counts. By counting these factors, patients can be placed in three risk groups, favourable, intermediate and poor, which gives a better prediction of how the disease will behave. This grouping helps the doctor assess the disease better, but on its own it does not decide what will happen to an individual patient.

Key results

22 months
Median overall survival in the whole population
95% CI 20.2–26.5 months; median follow-up 24.5 months
Six factors
Independent adverse prognostic factors
Haemoglobin below the lower limit of normal (P<0.0001); corrected calcium above the upper limit of normal (P=0.0006); Karnofsky performance status below 80% (P<0.0001); time from diagnosis to treatment less than 1 year (P=0.01); neutrophils above the upper limit of normal (P<0.0001); platelets above the upper limit of normal (P=0.01)
Median survival not reached; 2-year overall survival 75%
Favourable risk group (no prognostic factors; 133 patients)
Log-rank P<0.0001 for the comparison of the three groups
Median survival 27 months; 2-year overall survival 53%
Intermediate risk group (one or two factors; 301 patients)
Median survival 8.8 months; 2-year overall survival 7%
Poor risk group (three to six factors; 152 patients)
0.73
Concordance index (C-index)

Treatment arms and regimens

1Sunitinib treatment

396 patients. Multicentre observational study; the drug was given according to each centre's clinical routine, and doses are not reported in the abstract.

2Sorafenib treatment

200 patients. Multicentre observational study; the drug was given according to each centre's clinical routine, and doses are not reported in the abstract.

3Bevacizumab treatment

49 patients. Multicentre observational study; the drug was given according to each centre's clinical routine, and doses are not reported in the abstract.

Source of the regimen details: Abstract of the paper (observational study; the treatment regimen was not part of a study intervention)

Doses are given for the information of specialists, as in this study’s protocol, and are not a prescription. Every drug must be prescribed by the treating physician for the individual patient.

Study population

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had not previously received any VEGF-targeted therapy. Their baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected from three US cancer centres and four Canadian centres.

Endpoints

The aim of the study was to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The concordance index (C-index) of the model was also reported.

Safety and side effects

The abstract gives no information on treatment adverse events.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

Based on the abstract, this model confirms the components of the MSKCC model and extends it by adding platelet and neutrophil counts, and it can be used both in patient care and in the design of clinical trials with VEGF-targeted agents. Its current adoption in clinical guidelines should be checked separately, as the abstract does not address it.

Limitations

The abstract refers to bootstrap validation and does not report external validation. A C-index of 0.73 indicates moderate predictive accuracy. The total number of patients in the three risk groups (586 patients) is lower than the overall population of 645, and the reason is not explained in the abstract. Patients treated with three drugs (sunitinib, sorafenib and bevacizumab) were studied, and the model was not evaluated for other treatments in the abstract. Comparing the effects of the drugs with each other was not an aim of this study.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.