Questions and answers

Do red meat and processed meat cause cancer?

Processed meat is "carcinogenic" and red meat "probably carcinogenic": how big the risk is, whether cooking matters and what to eat instead

Updated: 28 October 20263 min read8 references
Show content for:
Short answer

For sausages, ham and other processed meats, yes: in 2015 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (part of the World Health Organization) classified them as "carcinogenic to humans" (Group 1), because there is sufficient evidence that they increase bowel (colorectal) cancer; red meat such as beef and lamb is "probably carcinogenic" (Group 2A) [1]. But the increase in risk is small: every 50 g of processed meat a day raises the risk of bowel cancer by roughly a fifth [2]. You do not need to give up meat; limit red meat to about three portions a week and eat very little, if any, processed meat [5].

Key points

  • Processed meat causes cancer (Group 1), and the main cancer linked to it is bowel cancer [1, 2].
  • Group 1 means the evidence is certain, not that it is as dangerous as smoking [2].
  • The risk for each person is small, but it rises with the amount eaten; no completely safe amount has been established [2].
  • Alternatives: pulses, whole grains, vegetables and fruit; in a large study, poultry and fish were not linked to bowel cancer [4, 5].

What do "red meat" and "processed meat" mean?

How meats are classified for cancer
TypeExamplesClassification
Processed meatSausages, salami, ham, hot dogs, smoked or salted meat, canned meatCarcinogenic to humans (Group 1) [1, 2]
Red meatBeef, veal, lamb, mutton, goat, horse and porkProbably carcinogenic (Group 2A) [1, 2]
Poultry and fishChicken, turkey, fishNot evaluated [2]

Processed meat is meat that has been changed by salting, curing, fermentation, smoking or other processes to add flavour or make it keep longer [2].

How big is the risk?

The International Agency for Research on Cancer says the risk is small but rises with the amount eaten [2]:

  • Processed meat: every 50 g a day raises the risk of bowel cancer by roughly a fifth [2, 3].
  • Red meat: if the link is proven to be cause and effect, every 100 g a day would raise the risk by about the same amount [2, 3].
  • In a more recent study of nearly half a million people in the UK, even moderate intake (about 76 g of red and processed meat a day) was linked to a slightly higher risk [4].

"A fifth higher" means that the risk you already have goes up a little; it does not mean that 1 in 5 people will get cancer. For comparison, about 34,000 cancer deaths a year worldwide are attributed to diets high in processed meat, against about one million due to smoking [2].

Which cancers is it linked to?

Processed meat causes bowel cancer; a link with stomach cancer has also been seen but is not conclusive [1, 2]. Red meat is most strongly linked to bowel cancer, and links with pancreatic and prostate cancer have also been seen [1, 2]. These links may be related to the iron in meat and to substances formed during processing or cooking, but the exact mechanism is not yet clear [2].

Does the cooking method matter?

Cooking at high temperatures or in direct contact with a flame or hot surface, such as grilling over charcoal, barbecuing and pan-frying, produces more chemicals that cause cancer in animals; these form in any muscle meat, including poultry and fish [2, 6]. But it has not been shown that the cooking method changes cancer risk in people [2, 6].

To be on the safe side [6]:

  • Do not put meat directly over a flame, and shorten the time it spends on very high heat; for example, partly cook meat in the microwave before grilling.
  • Turn meat often while cooking.
  • Cut off charred and blackened parts, and do not use meat drippings to make gravy.

What should I do? Keep processed meat to a minimum

  1. 1

    Eat very little processed meat, or none

    This is the most important step [5]. Do not make sausages, salami or ham an everyday food, breakfast or regular snack.

  2. 2

    Red meat: at most about 3 portions a week

    That is about 350 to 500 g of cooked meat a week in total [5]. Eating meat has known health benefits, and you do not need to cut it out completely [2, 5].

  3. 3

    Fill the gap with these

    Base most meals on whole grains, vegetables, fruit and pulses (lentils, beans, chickpeas), and aim for at least 30 g of fibre a day [5]. In a large study, fibre from bread and breakfast cereals was linked to a lower risk of bowel cancer, and poultry and fish were not linked to this cancer [4].

  4. 4

    Do not forget screening

    No diet replaces bowel cancer screening; see At what age is a screening colonoscopy needed?

Frequently asked questions

Should I become a vegetarian?

There is no need. Eating meat has known health benefits, and this evaluation did not directly compare vegetarians with meat-eaters [2]. Limiting the amount is enough [5].

Are chicken sausages and chicken ham carcinogenic too?

Processed meat can also be made from poultry and has the same definition: meat changed by salting, curing or smoking [2]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer could not say whether any particular type of processed meat is less risky [2].

What about kebabs and grilled chicken cooked over charcoal?

Grilling over charcoal and direct contact with a flame produce more chemicals in any kind of meat, but their effect in people has not been proven [2, 6]. Charring less, turning often and cutting off blackened parts are simple precautions [6].

How much processed meat is safe?

No completely safe amount has been established; the risk rises with the amount eaten [2]. The advice is to eat very little, if any [5].

If I have had bowel cancer, should I stop eating red meat?

The evaluation could not reach conclusions for people who have already had cancer [2]. The general advice is to follow the same nutrition recommendations as far as you can after treatment [5]. See Nutrition during cancer treatment.

Is raw or rare meat healthier?

There are no data on cancer risk, but raw meat carries a risk of infection [2].

For physicians

Notes for doctors (for physicians)

For physiciansIARC (Monograph 114, 2015).
For physicians

IARC (Monograph 114, 2015). 22 experts from 10 countries, more than 800 studies. Processed meat Group 1 (sufficient evidence for colorectal cancer; positive association with stomach cancer); red meat Group 2A (limited evidence in humans for colorectal cancer and strong mechanistic evidence; associations with pancreatic and prostate cancer) [1, 2]. Mechanisms: haem iron, N-nitroso compounds and PAHs formed during processing, and heterocyclic aromatic amines and PAHs formed during high-temperature cooking [2, 6].

Effect size. Dose–response meta-analysis of cohorts (Chan, PLoS One 2011): RR for colorectal cancer per 50 g/day of processed meat 1.18 (1.10 to 1.28) and per 100 g/day of red meat 1.17 (1.05 to 1.31); highest vs lowest intake of red and processed meat 1.22 (1.11 to 1.34); roughly linear increase up to about 140 g/day. In separate analyses of red and processed meat, the association with rectal cancer was not significant [3]. UK Biobank (475,581 people, mean 5.7 years, 2,609 cases): mean intake of 76 vs 21 g/day HR 1.20 (1.04 to 1.37); top fifth of fibre from bread and breakfast cereals 14% lower risk (2% to 24%); alcohol 8% higher risk per 10 g/day; fish, poultry, fruit and vegetables not associated [4].

The opposing view. NutriRECS (Annals 2019) rated the certainty of evidence as low to very low using GRADE: a reduction of 3 servings a week was associated with only a "very small" reduction in cancer mortality and incidence [8], and issued a weak recommendation to continue current intake [7]. The direction of the association is the same in these reviews; the disagreement is about the certainty of observational evidence and the importance of the absolute effect.

WCRF/AICR recommendation. Red meat no more than about 3 portions a week (350 to 500 g cooked weight); processed meat very little, if any; at least 30 g/day of fibre from food [5].

References

8 references
Show all referencesClose the reference list

Numbers in the text, such as [1], refer to these sources. Sources with a “Study card” button are summarised in the site’s evidence library.

  1. 1
    Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meatBouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, et al.; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group · Lancet Oncol · 2015;16:1599-1600
    DOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  2. 2
    Q&A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat (IARC Monographs Volume 114)International Agency for Research on Cancer · iarc.who.int · 2015
    Source Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
  3. 3
    Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studiesChan DS, Lau R, Aune D, et al · PLoS One · 2011;6:e20456
    DOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3
  4. 4
    Diet and colorectal cancer in UK Biobank: a prospective studyBradbury KE, Murphy N, Key TJ · Int J Epidemiol · 2020;49:246-258
    DOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4
  5. 5
    The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: Impact and Future DirectionsClinton SK, Giovannucci EL, Hursting SD · J Nutr · 2020;150:663-671
    DOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
  6. 6
    Chemicals in Meat Cooked at High Temperatures and Cancer RiskNational Cancer Institute · cancer.gov · 2017
    Source Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5 6
  7. 7
    Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) ConsortiumJohnston BC, Zeraatkar D, Han MA, et al · Ann Intern Med · 2019;171:756-764
  8. 8
    Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort StudiesHan MA, Zeraatkar D, Guyatt GH, et al · Ann Intern Med · 2019;171:711-720

This page is based on reputable scientific sources and was last updated on 28 October 2026. The content of this website is for educational and informational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis or treatment by a specialist physician. Consult your treating physician about any treatment decision.