Observational studyHead and neck cancers

Human Papillomavirus and Survival of Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer

N Engl J Med · 2010721 eligible patients in RTOG 0129; 433 oropharyngeal cancer patients, with HPV status determined in 323 (206 HPV-positive)
Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tân PF, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010. 363:24-35
Study type
Observational study
Design
Retrospective (post hoc, outside the protocol) analysis of tumour HPV status and survival in oropharyngeal cancer patients enrolled in the phase 3 randomised trial RTOG 0129 (accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost versus standard radiotherapy, both with high-dose cisplatin)
Sample size
721 eligible patients in RTOG 0129; 433 oropharyngeal cancer patients, with HPV status determined in 323 (206 HPV-positive)
Source
N Engl J Med · 2010
Trial registration
NCT00047008

In plain words

This study found that people whose oropharyngeal cancer (cancer of the part of the throat behind the mouth) is linked to the human papillomavirus (HPV) live markedly longer after treatment with radiotherapy and cisplatin. After 3 years, 82.4% of patients with HPV-positive tumours were alive, compared with 57.1% of patients with HPV-negative tumours. Smoking also raises the risk of death, and the more someone has smoked, the higher this risk.

Key results

70.3% vs 64.3%
3-year overall survival: accelerated vs standard radiotherapy
P=0.18; hazard ratio for death 0.90 (95% CI 0.72–1.13)
HPV-positive: 0.89 (0.51–1.55); HPV-negative: 0.91 (0.69–1.19)
HR for death with accelerated radiotherapy in HPV subgroups
No significant difference
63.8% (206 of 323 patients)
Frequency of HPV-positive tumours
82.4% vs 57.1%
3-year overall survival: HPV-positive vs HPV-negative
P<0.001 by log-rank test
73.7% vs 43.4%
3-year progression-free survival: HPV-positive vs HPV-negative
P<0.001; adjusted HR for relapse or death 0.49 (95% CI 0.33–0.74)
58% reduction; hazard ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.27–0.66)
Risk of death in HPV-positive disease (after adjustment for age, race, tumour and nodal stage, tobacco use and treatment group)
83.6% vs 51.3%
3-year overall survival by p16: positive vs negative
Adjusted HR for death 0.33 (95% CI 0.21–0.53); HPV and p16 agreement: kappa 0.80
13.6% vs 35.1%
3-year locoregional failure: HPV-positive vs HPV-negative
P<0.001; the rate of distant metastasis did not differ significantly
1% increase in the risk of death and of relapse or death per pack-year
Effect of tobacco use
HR 1.01 in both the HPV-positive and HPV-negative subgroups
Low risk 93.0%; intermediate risk 70.8%; high risk 46.2%
Risk groups (recursive partitioning analysis): 3-year overall survival
HR versus low risk: intermediate 3.54 (1.91–6.57); high 7.16 (3.97–12.93)
Drugs in this study:Cisplatin (Platinol)

Treatment arms and regimens

1Accelerated-fractionation radiotherapy (concomitant boost) + cisplatin

Radiotherapy: 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks, with a concomitant boost given as twice-daily irradiation on 12 treatment days.

Cisplatin: 100 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 22 (2 doses).

360 patients.

2Standard-fractionation radiotherapy + cisplatin

Radiotherapy: 70 Gy in 35 fractions (2 Gy per fraction) over 7 weeks.

Cisplatin: 100 mg/m² IV on days 1, 22 and 43 (3 doses).

361 patients.

Source of the regimen details: Full text of the paper (author manuscript in PMC2943767)

Doses are given for the information of specialists, as in this study’s protocol, and are not a prescription. Every drug must be prescribed by the treating physician for the individual patient.

Study population

RTOG 0129 trial (July 2002 to May 2005; 743 randomised patients, 721 eligible patients): previously untreated, pathologically confirmed stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx without distant metastasis (M0); Zubrod performance status 0 or 1; age 18 years or older; adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. Stratified by tumour site (larynx versus other), N stage and performance status.

The HPV analysis was limited to the 433 patients with oropharyngeal cancer (60.1%), and HPV status was determined in 323 (74.6%) by in situ hybridisation (HPV-16, then 12 other high-risk types); p16 expression was also assessed by immunohistochemistry (strong, diffuse staining in 70% or more of tumour cells = positive).

Endpoints

Primary endpoint of the trial: overall survival (from randomisation to death). Secondary: progression-free survival and its components (locoregional failure and distant metastasis) and second primary tumours. The HPV status analysis was a post hoc subgroup analysis not prespecified in the protocol. Median follow-up 4.8 years (range 0.3 to 6.5).

Safety and side effects

There were no significant differences between the two groups: death within 30 days of starting treatment 3.3% (accelerated) versus 1.9% (standard; P=0.26); acute grade 3 or 4 adverse events: 80.0% versus 83.7% (P=0.21); late grade 3 or 4 adverse events: 25.7% versus 21.1% (P=0.18).

Both regimens are high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy, and the rate of severe acute adverse events is above 80%.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

This analysis showed that tumour HPV status (and p16 as a surrogate marker) is a strong and independent prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer, and together with tobacco use (more than 10 pack-years) and T and N stage it divides patients into three risk groups. The RTOG 0129 trial itself showed that accelerated radiotherapy with cisplatin has no survival advantage over standard radiotherapy with three doses of cisplatin.

Limitations

The HPV analysis was retrospective and post hoc, and grouping by HPV status was not randomised; HPV status was determined in only 74.6% of oropharyngeal cancer patients (although no differences in characteristics or survival were seen between patients with and without an HPV result). All patients received high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy, and these data do not justify treatment de-intensification in HPV-positive disease.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.