Clinical trialBlood cancers (leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma)Multiple myeloma

Bortezomib or High-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

N Engl J Med · 2005669 patients
Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Irwin D, Stadtmauer EA, Facon T, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005. 352:2487-2498
Study type
Clinical trial
Study name
APEX
Design
Randomised comparative trial (bortezomib versus high-dose dexamethasone); patients in the dexamethasone group could cross over to bortezomib in a companion study after disease progression
Sample size
669 patients
Source
N Engl J Med · 2005

In plain words

In this large study, people with multiple myeloma that had come back were treated either with the drug bortezomib or with high-dose dexamethasone. Patients in the bortezomib group responded to treatment more often, went longer before the disease got worse and survived better. On the other hand, severe (grade 3 or 4) side effects were slightly more common in the bortezomib group. Decisions about treatment should always be made with your own doctor.

Key results

38% vs 18% (bortezomib vs dexamethasone)
Combined complete and partial response
P<0.001
6% vs less than 1%
Complete response
P<0.001
6.22 months (189 days) vs 3.49 months (106 days)
Median time to disease progression (primary endpoint)
HR 0.55; P<0.001
80% vs 66%
One-year survival
P=0.003
HR 0.57 in favour of bortezomib
Overall survival
P=0.001
Drugs in this study:Bortezomib (Velcade)

Treatment arms and regimens

1Bortezomib

Bortezomib IV bolus at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² body surface area on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 for eight 3-week cycles, then on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 for three 5-week cycles.

2High-dose dexamethasone

Oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12 and 17 to 20 for four 5-week cycles, then on days 1 to 4 for five 4-week cycles. Patients in this group were allowed to cross over to bortezomib in a companion study after disease progression.

Source of the regimen details: Abstract of the paper

Doses are given for the information of specialists, as in this study’s protocol, and are not a prescription. Every drug must be prescribed by the treating physician for the individual patient.

Study population

Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received one to three prior treatments.

Endpoints

Primary endpoint: time to disease progression. Results reported in the abstract also included response rate, one-year survival, overall survival and grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

Safety and side effects

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 75% of patients in the bortezomib group and 60% of patients in the dexamethasone group.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

This trial showed that in relapsed multiple myeloma after one to three prior treatments, bortezomib is superior to high-dose dexamethasone in terms of response, time to progression and survival. The current place of this regimen in clinical guidelines and its regulatory status should be checked in up-to-date sources, as the abstract does not address them.

Limitations

Patients in the dexamethasone group were allowed to cross over to bortezomib after disease progression. This may affect the interpretation of the overall survival results. Other limitations should be checked in the full text of the paper. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were also more frequent in the bortezomib group.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.