Clinical guideline

Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

JCO · 2024102 publications included in the systematic review
Kamboj M, Bohlke K, Baptiste DM, Dunleavy K, Fueger A, Jones L, et al. JCO. 2024. 42:1699-1721
Study type
Clinical guideline
Study name
ASCO Vaccination Guideline 2024
Design
Clinical practice guideline based on a systematic literature review (including systematic reviews, randomised trials and non-randomised studies), with recommendations formulated by an ASCO expert panel
Sample size
102 publications included in the systematic review
Source
JCO · 2024

In plain words

People with cancer may be more vulnerable to infections because of the illness or its treatments. This guideline recommends that your vaccination record is noted from the very first visit and that the vaccines you need are given on time. After a stem cell transplant, CAR-T therapy or treatments that destroy B cells, some vaccines may need to be given again. Vaccinating the people you live with also helps protect you. Always plan the timing and type of vaccines with your treating doctor.

Key points

102 publications
Total number of publications included in the systematic review
24
Systematic reviews
14
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
64
Non-randomised studies
1 January 2013 to 16 February 2023
Search period in PubMed and the Cochrane Library
This review builds on the 2013 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline

Key guideline recommendations

  1. The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and, where possible, prevent infection. Optimising vaccination status should be considered a key element of the care of patients with cancer.

    Level of evidence and strength of recommendation in the full guideline
  2. This approach includes documenting vaccination status at the patient's first visit, timely administration of recommended vaccines, and appropriate revaccination after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CAR-T therapy or B-cell-depleting therapies.

    Level of evidence and strength of recommendation in the full guideline
  3. Active engagement and coordination among health care providers, including primary care physicians, pharmacists and members of the nursing team, are essential.

    Level of evidence and strength of recommendation in the full guideline
  4. Vaccination of household contacts increases the protection of patients with cancer.

    Level of evidence and strength of recommendation in the full guideline
  5. Some vaccination and revaccination schedules in patients with cancer may be affected by underlying immune status and the anticancer treatment received; vaccination strategies may therefore differ from the recommendations for the general healthy adult population.

    Level of evidence and strength of recommendation in the full guideline

Study population

Adults with solid tumours or haematological malignancies, and their household contacts.

Endpoints

The systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of vaccines used in adults with cancer or their household contacts. The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and, where possible, prevent infection.

Safety and side effects

The abstract gives no specific figures on vaccine adverse events. Safety details are available in the full guideline.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

This guideline builds on the 2013 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline and regards optimising vaccination status as a key part of the care of patients with cancer. This requires coordination between the oncologist, primary care physician, pharmacist and nurse. Because immune status and anticancer treatment may change the vaccination schedule, the schedule may differ from that of the general healthy adult population. Details of the recommendations for each vaccine and each patient group should be checked in the full guideline.

Limitations

Most of the evidence concerned COVID-19 vaccines, and most of the included studies (64 of 102 publications) were non-randomised; only 14 were RCTs. The literature search extended to 16 February 2023 and does not include later evidence. The abstract does not state the level of evidence or strength of each recommendation.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.