Clinical trialProstate cancer

Denosumab in Men Receiving Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

N Engl J Med · 20091468 patients (734 in each group)
Smith MR, Egerdie B, Toriz NH, Feldman R, Tammela TL, Saad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009. 361:745-755
Study type
Clinical trial
Study name
HALT 138
Design
Randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study
Sample size
1468 patients (734 in each group)
Source
N Engl J Med · 2009
Trial registration
NCT00089674

In plain words

Hormone treatment (androgen deprivation) for prostate cancer can weaken the bones and increase the risk of fractures. In this study, an injection of denosumab under the skin every 6 months increased bone strength (density) compared with a placebo. New fractures of the spine were also less common in the denosumab group (1.5% versus 3.9%). Side effects were similar in the two groups.

Key results

5.6% increase in the denosumab group vs 1.0% decrease in the placebo group
Change in lumbar spine bone mineral density at month 24
P<0.001; significant difference from month 1, sustained to month 36
Significant increase with denosumab at all time points
Bone mineral density at the total hip, femoral neck and distal third of the radius
1.5% vs 3.9%
New vertebral fractures at month 36
Relative risk 0.38 (95% CI 0.19–0.78); P=0.006
Drugs in this study:Denosumab (Xgeva)

Treatment arms and regimens

1Denosumab

Denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously (1 mL injection) every 6 months for 36 months, with daily supplements of calcium at least 1 g and vitamin D at least 400 IU (734 patients).

2Placebo

Subcutaneous placebo every 6 months with the same calcium and vitamin D supplements (734 patients).

Source of the regimen details: Full text of the paper (PMC3038121)

Doses are given for the information of specialists, as in this study’s protocol, and are not a prescription. Every drug must be prescribed by the treating physician for the individual patient.

Study population

1468 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer receiving ADT (bilateral orchiectomy or a GnRH agonist) with an expected duration of at least 12 months, who were aged 70 years or older, or under 70 years with low bone mineral density (T-score below −1.0 at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck) or a history of osteoporotic fracture. Concurrent anticancer therapy or radiotherapy and current oral bisphosphonate use were exclusion criteria.

Endpoints

Primary endpoint: percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at month 24.

Key secondary endpoints: percentage change in bone mineral density at the femoral neck and total hip at month 24 and at all three sites at month 36, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures.

Safety and side effects

The overall adverse event rate was about 87% in both groups; serious adverse events 34.6% versus 30.6%; discontinuation because of an adverse event 6.7% versus 6.5%; one case of hypocalcaemia (0.1%) with denosumab.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

This study shows that denosumab can be useful for preserving bone health and reducing vertebral fractures in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer. The status of drug approvals and clinical guideline recommendations should be checked separately, as the abstract does not mention them.

Limitations

The abstract does not mention the limitations of the study. Details of specific adverse events and their grading should be checked in the full text of the paper.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.