Clinical guideline

2023 updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus recommendations: Prevention of nausea and vomiting following moderately emetic risk antineoplastic agents

Support Care Cancer · 2023342 papers identified, of which 19 were relevant
Scotté F, Schwartzberg L, Iihara H, Aapro M, Gralla R, Hesketh PJ, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2023. 32:45
Study type
Clinical guideline
Study name
MASCC/ESMO 2023 MEC
Design
Consensus guideline based on a systematic literature review (search of Medline, Embase and Scopus from June 2015 to January 2023)
Sample size
342 papers identified, of which 19 were relevant
Source
Support Care Cancer · 2023

In plain words

Some chemotherapy drugs carry a moderate risk of causing nausea and vomiting. This guideline helps doctors choose better preventive medicines. For some patients, such as those receiving high-dose carboplatin or women under 50 receiving oxaliplatin, a three-drug combination is recommended. For most other patients, a two-drug combination is enough, and the steroid is needed only on the first day of chemotherapy. Any change to your medicines should be agreed with your doctor.

Key points

342 papers
Papers identified in the systematic review
Search from June 2015 to January 2023
19 papers
Relevant papers for updating the recommendations
For patients receiving carboplatin (AUC ≥ 5) and women under 50 years treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy
Three-drug prophylaxis (NK1 receptor antagonist + 5-HT3 receptor antagonist + steroid)
Important change in clinical practice
Still recommended for other MEC regimens
Two-drug prophylaxis (5-HT3 receptor antagonist + steroid)
Limited to day 1 in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens
Duration of steroid use
Based on demonstrated non-inferiority between different regimens

Key guideline recommendations

  1. For patients treated with carboplatin (AUC ≥ 5) and women under 50 years receiving oxaliplatin-based therapy, antiemetic prophylaxis with the triple combination of a neurokinin (NK)1 receptor antagonist, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and a steroid is recommended.

    Level of evidence not stated in the abstract; see the full text
  2. The two-drug combination of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and a steroid remains the recommended prophylaxis for other MEC regimens.

    Level of evidence not stated in the abstract; see the full text
  3. It is recommended that steroid administration in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens be limited to day 1, because non-inferiority between different regimens has been shown.

    Level of evidence not stated in the abstract; see the full text

Study population

Patients receiving systemic cancer therapy with moderately emetogenic agents (MEC). Further details of the target population are not given in the abstract and are in the full text of the paper.

Endpoints

This paper is a guideline and has no trial endpoint. Its aim was to update the 2015 MASCC guideline for the control of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic systemic cancer therapy.

Safety and side effects

The abstract gives no information on grade ≥ 3 adverse events.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

According to this guideline, for patients receiving carboplatin (AUC ≥ 5) and women under 50 years treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy, three-drug prophylaxis with an NK1 antagonist, a 5-HT3 antagonist and a steroid is recommended. For other MEC, the two-drug combination of a 5-HT3 antagonist and a steroid is still recommended, and the steroid should be limited to day 1. Experience so far suggests that sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan have an emetogenic potential comparable to carboplatin > AUC 5, but more antiemetic data are needed for these drugs. The status of adoption of this guideline in other national or organisational guidelines should be checked separately.

Limitations

According to the abstract, more data are needed on the emetogenic potential of new moderately emetogenic drugs, especially sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Future studies should also systematically include patient-related risk assessment so that emetic risk is defined beyond the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy itself.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.