Clinical guidelineCervical cancer

Screening for Cervical Cancer

JAMA · 2018
US Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, et al. JAMA. 2018. 320:674
Study type
Clinical guideline
Study name
USPSTF 2018
Design
Clinical guideline recommendation statement based on an evidence review (clinical trials and cohort studies) and a decision analysis model
Source
JAMA · 2018

In plain words

Regular screening can find precancerous changes of the cervix or cancer early and greatly lower the risk of getting it and of dying from it. According to this recommendation, women aged 21 to 29 should have a cytology test (Pap smear) every 3 years, and women aged 30 to 65 can choose one of three options: cytology every 3 years, an HPV test every 5 years, or both together every 5 years. Screening is not needed for women under 21, women over 65 who have had enough screening before and are not at high risk, or women whose cervix was removed for reasons other than a high-grade precancerous lesion or cancer. Make the final decision with your doctor.

Key points

Decrease from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100,000 women
Trend in cervical cancer mortality in the United States (2000 to 2015)
Screening every 3 years with cytology alone
Women aged 21 to 29 years
Grade A recommendation; high certainty that the benefits substantially outweigh the harms
Cytology alone every 3 years, or hrHPV alone every 5 years, or cotesting every 5 years
Women aged 30 to 65 years
Grade A recommendation; high certainty that the benefits outweigh the harms
Recommendation against screening
Women under 21 years
Grade D recommendation
Recommendation against screening
Women over 65 years with adequate prior screening and not at high risk
Grade D recommendation
Recommendation against screening
Women with hysterectomy and removal of the cervix, without a history of high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer
Grade D recommendation

Key guideline recommendations

  1. Screening for cervical cancer every 3 years with cervical cytology alone is recommended in women aged 21 to 29 years.

    A
  2. Screening every 3 years with cervical cytology alone, every 5 years with hrHPV testing alone, or every 5 years with hrHPV testing in combination with cytology (cotesting) is recommended in women aged 30 to 65 years.

    A
  3. Screening for cervical cancer is recommended against in women younger than 21 years.

    D
  4. Screening for cervical cancer is recommended against in women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer.

    D
  5. Screening for cervical cancer is recommended against in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer.

    D

Study population

Women at average risk of cervical cancer; age groups under 21 years, 21 to 29 years, 30 to 65 years and over 65 years, and women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix.

Endpoints

The evidence review focused on trials and cohort studies comparing screening with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing alone or together with cytology (cotesting) against cervical cytology alone. A decision analysis model was also commissioned to evaluate the ages to start and stop screening, the optimal screening interval, the effectiveness of different strategies and their associated benefits and harms.

Safety and side effects

According to the abstract, the harms of cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 to 65 years were assessed as "moderate". Further details on harms are not given in the abstract and are in the full text of the statement.

Clinical significance and place in guidelines

This statement updated the 2012 USPSTF recommendation and, for women aged 30 to 65 years, added primary screening with hrHPV testing alone every 5 years as a recommended option (grade A) alongside cytology and cotesting. The recommendations apply to women at average risk, and their current status in national and international guidelines (and more recent versions) should be checked.

Limitations

The abstract does not mention limitations of the evidence; details are in the full text of the statement. These recommendations are for women at average risk, and some of the findings are based on a decision analysis model.

This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.