AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Study type
- Clinical guideline
- Study name
- AASLD HCC 2023
- Design
- Practice Guidance based on the consensus of a multidisciplinary panel; level of evidence based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Level 1 to 5) and strength of recommendation (Strong/Weak)
- Source
- Hepatology · 2023
In plain words
This guide from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases explains to doctors how to prevent, find early and treat liver cancer. Its key advice includes: hepatitis B vaccine for all newborns; an ultrasound scan with an AFP blood test every 6 months for people at high risk (such as people with cirrhosis); treatment decisions made by a team of different specialists; and immunotherapy combinations as the first treatment for advanced disease.
Key guideline recommendations
- Level 2, Strong
Hepatitis B vaccination should be given to all newborns and to high-risk adults not vaccinated at birth, to reduce the risk of HCC.
- Level 2, Strong
Antiviral drugs should be given to all patients who meet treatment criteria for HBV and HCV infection according to AASLD guidelines; in chronic viral hepatitis, HBV suppression and HCV eradication reduce the risk of developing HCC.
- Level 2, Strong
Patients at high risk of HCC should be enrolled in surveillance programmes, provided they are candidates for HCC treatment.
- Level 2, Strong
HCC surveillance should be performed with ultrasound and AFP at six-monthly intervals (approximately every 6 months).
- Level 1, Strong
Patients with any suspicious lesion of 1 cm or larger on ultrasound should undergo diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI.
- Level 1, Strong
In at-risk patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B, the diagnosis of HCC should be based on non-invasive imaging criteria and/or pathology.
- Level 5, Strong / Level 3, Strong
Although several staging systems exist, AASLD recommends the BCLC system; patients with HCC should be evaluated and managed in a multidisciplinary care setting.
- Level 2, Strong
In patients with cirrhosis, surgical resection is the treatment of choice for patients with limited tumour burden, well-compensated cirrhosis without clinically significant portal hypertension, and an adequate future liver remnant.
- Level 2, Strong
AASLD recommends immune checkpoint inhibitor-based adjuvant systemic therapy in patients at high risk of recurrence after liver resection or local ablation. (Note: this recommendation was based on the early IMbrave050 results; in the updated 2026 analysis, the recurrence-free survival benefit was not sustained.)
- Level 2, Strong
Liver transplantation should be the treatment of choice for transplant-eligible patients with early-stage HCC in the setting of clinically significant portal hypertension and/or decompensated cirrhosis.
- Level 2, Strong
Patients who are transplant-eligible apart from an initial tumour burden beyond the Milan criteria (especially those meeting the UNOS downstaging criteria) should be considered for liver transplantation after successful downstaging to within the Milan criteria and an observation period of 3 to 6 months; patients with AFP above 1000 ng/mL must reach an AFP below 500 ng/mL to be considered successfully downstaged.
- Level 1, Strong
Thermal ablation (radiofrequency or microwave) should be the treatment of choice for early-stage HCC of 3 cm or smaller in patients who are not suitable for, or decline, surgery.
- Level 1, Strong / Level 2, Strong
Patients with BCLC stage B HCC should be treated with transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). AASLD does not recommend combining systemic therapy with arterial therapies in stage B outside a clinical trial.
- Level 3, Strong
Radioembolisation is recommended as an alternative to chemoembolisation in patients with BCLC stage B HCC.
- Level 1, Strong
Systemic therapy should be offered to patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A cirrhosis or selected Child-Pugh B patients) and ECOG PS 0 to 1 who have BCLC stage C HCC, or BCLC stage B HCC that is not amenable to, or has progressed after, locoregional therapy.
- Level 2, Strong
Patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis should receive atezolizumab + bevacizumab or durvalumab + tremelimumab as preferred first-line options.
- Level 5, Strong
Patients being considered for atezolizumab + bevacizumab should undergo upper endoscopy (EGD) to assess high-risk stigmata of variceal or other gastrointestinal bleeding; patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 6 months or high-risk stigmata should have their varices adequately treated before starting, or may be considered for durvalumab + tremelimumab.
- Level 1, Strong
In Child-Pugh A patients with contraindications to atezolizumab + bevacizumab and durvalumab + tremelimumab, first-line sorafenib or lenvatinib should be offered.
- Level 3, Weak
Selected patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis may be offered sorafenib, lenvatinib or single-agent anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
- Level 5, Weak
Second line after atezolizumab + bevacizumab or durvalumab + tremelimumab (in patients not eligible for a clinical trial): sorafenib or lenvatinib are the preferred agents; after atezolizumab + bevacizumab, cabozantinib, regorafenib or ipilimumab + nivolumab may also be used.
- Level 1, Strong
After sorafenib or lenvatinib (in patients not eligible for a clinical trial): cabozantinib or regorafenib (or ramucirumab in patients with AFP ≥400 ng/mL) are the preferred agents.
- Level 4, Strong
AASLD recommends against using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with HCC recurrence after liver transplantation, because of the increased risk of graft loss and death.
Study population
People at risk of HCC (cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B, etc.) and patients with HCC at all stages.
Clinical significance and place in guidelines
This document is the main US hepatology reference for HCC; it presents immunotherapy combinations (atezolizumab + bevacizumab and durvalumab + tremelimumab) as the preferred first-line options, and six-monthly surveillance with ultrasound and AFP as the standard. Its recommendation for immunotherapy-based adjuvant treatment was based on the early IMbrave050 results, which were not confirmed in the updated analysis; in addition, the results of CheckMate 9DW, EMERALD-1 and LEAP-012 were published after this document.
Limitations
This document is a consensus-based "practice guidance" rather than a guideline based on a systematic review and GRADE; it was prepared before several important trials, and some recommendations (especially adjuvant treatment) need revision in light of newer evidence.
This summary was prepared by the editorial team from the published paper; the original paper is the final reference. Read the original abstract on PubMed.