New treatments for multiple myeloma: from melphalan to four-drug combinations and cell therapy

The story of twenty years of progress in myeloma treatment, today's treatment for newly diagnosed patients, and the new options when the disease comes back

Updated: 28 October 20262 min read11 references
Show content for:

Key points

  • The first treatment for myeloma today is a combination of three or four new drugs; in suitable patients, together with a transplant of the patient's own cells [10].
  • Adding daratumumab to treatment increased the number of patients alive 5 years after starting from 54 to 67 in every 100 [4].
  • Maintenance drugs after a transplant controlled the disease more than twice as long [3].
  • When the disease comes back, CAR-T cell therapy and antibodies that link immune cells to myeloma cells have had unprecedented results [7, 8].

Twenty years of change

Multiple myeloma is a cancer of plasma cells, the antibody-making cells in the bone marrow, and it damages the bones, kidneys and blood. Until the early 2000s, most patients were treated with melphalan chemotherapy tablets and a steroid [2].

The first turning point was bortezomib. When the disease had come back, more patients responded to it and more survived [1]. When it was added to the first treatment of older people, complete response rose from 4 to 30 in every 100 [2]. Then came lenalidomide, which after a transplant kept the disease quiet more than twice as long and lengthened life [3].

The next turning point was the antibody daratumumab. In patients not having a transplant, adding it to two other drugs kept the disease quiet nearly twice as long, and more patients survived [4].

67 vs 54
In every 100 patients, alive after 5 years
With daratumumab added, in patients without a transplant [4]
84 vs 68
In every 100 patients, free of progression after 4 years
Four drugs versus three drugs, with a transplant [5]
83 vs 30
In every 100 patients whose disease had come back, controlled after 3 years
Two new antibodies versus usual treatment [8]

Today's treatment for newly diagnosed patients

  1. 1

    If a transplant is suitable for you

    Several cycles of a four-drug combination (daratumumab with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone), then a transplant of your own cells and then a maintenance drug. With four drugs, four years later the disease had stayed quiet in most patients (more than 8 in 10); more than with three-drug treatment [5].

  2. 2

    If a transplant is not suitable

    Three-‎ or four-drug combinations without a transplant are also very effective [4, 6].

  3. 3

    Maintenance drug

    Lenalidomide tablets (sometimes with daratumumab) for a long time [3, 5].

  4. 4

    Bone care and preventing infection

    Bone-strengthening medicine, vaccines and infection prevention are part of treatment [10, 11].

When the disease comes back

Myeloma usually comes back after a while, but today there are stronger options than ever. CAR-T cell therapy (the patient's own immune cells trained in the laboratory to find myeloma) greatly lengthened disease control in lenalidomide-resistant disease, and deaths were fewer [7]. Bispecific antibodies, such as teclistamab, which links immune cells to myeloma cells, together with daratumumab, kept the disease quiet for three years in most patients; with usual treatment, in only a third [8] (news of this study).

Smouldering myeloma: wait or treat?

"Smouldering myeloma" means tests show myeloma cells but no damage has been done to the body yet. Most of these patients are simply followed; but in high-risk people, daratumumab under the skin delayed progression to active myeloma, and more patients survived [9].

When should I call my doctor?

Report fever or shivering (infection is common and dangerous in myeloma) [11], new or severe bone pain, weakness or numbness in the legs, confusion or great thirst (a sign of high calcium) and passing less urine straight away.

Frequently asked questions

Can myeloma be cured?

Most of the time the aim is long-term control; but with today's treatments, many patients live for years with controlled disease, and in a group of patients even very sensitive tests no longer show the disease [5, 6].

Is a bone marrow transplant needed?

In suitable patients, a transplant of their own cells is still part of standard treatment; in others, drug combinations without a transplant are also very effective [10, 6].

Why is there so much emphasis on infection and vaccines?

Myeloma and its treatments weaken the immune system; vaccines and medicines to prevent infection save patients' lives [11].

For physicians

Show detailsHide
For physicians

APEX: 1-year survival 80% versus 66% [1]. VISTA: CR 30% versus 4% [2]. Lenalidomide maintenance meta-analysis: median PFS 52.8 versus 23.5 months [3]. MAIA: median PFS 61.9 versus 34.4 months, 60-month OS 66.6% versus 53.6% [4]. PERSEUS: D-VRd, 48-month PFS 84.3% versus 67.7%, MRD negativity 75.2% [5]. CEPHEUS: MRD negativity 60.9% versus 39.4% [6]. CARTITUDE-4: cilta-cel in lenalidomide-refractory disease, deaths 24% versus 39% [7]. MajesTEC-3: Tec-Dara, 36-month PFS 83.4% versus 29.7% [8]. AQUILA: high-risk smouldering myeloma [9]. EHA-EMN 2025 [10]; IMWG 2022 infection prevention [11]. Doses: regimens on the multiple myeloma page.

Scientific evidence

Show detailsHide

Scientific evidence

10 items
Clinical trial

Bortezomib or High-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

N Engl J Med · 2005
38% vs 18% (bortezomib vs dexamethasone)Combined complete and partial response
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

N Engl J Med · 2008
24.0 months vs 16.6 monthsTime to progression
Meta-analysis

Lenalidomide Maintenance After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

JCO · 2017
52.8 vs 23.5 monthsMedian progression-free survival (PFS)
Clinical guideline

EHA–EMN Evidence-Based Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma

Nat Rev Clin Oncol · 2025
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes.

Leukemia · 2025
61.9 vs 34.4 monthsMedian progression-free survival
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

N Engl J Med · 2024
84.3% vs 67.7%48-month progression-free survival
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 CEPHEUS trial.

Nat Med · 2025
60.9% vs 39.4%MRD negativity (10⁻⁵)
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Daratumumab or Active Monitoring for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

N Engl J Med · 2025
63.1% vs 40.8%5-year progression-free survival
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Cilta-cel in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-4): an updated analysis including overall survival from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol · 2026
Not reached vs 11.8 monthsMedian progression-free survival
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Teclistamab plus Daratumumab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

N Engl J Med · 2026
83.4% vs 29.7%36-month progression-free survival

Read more

References

11 references
Show all references, 11 with a study cardClose the reference list

Numbers in the text, such as [1], refer to these sources. Sources with a “Study card” button are summarised in the site’s evidence library.

  1. 1
    Bortezomib or High-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple MyelomaRichardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, et al · N Engl J Med · 2005;352:2487-2498
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2
  2. 2
    Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple MyelomaSan Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al · N Engl J Med · 2008;359:906-917
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3
  3. 3
    Lenalidomide Maintenance After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-AnalysisMcCarthy PL, Holstein SA, Petrucci MT, et al · J Clin Oncol · 2017;35:3279-3289
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4
  4. 4
    Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomesFacon T, Moreau P, Weisel K, et al · Leukemia · 2025;39:942-950
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5
  5. 5
    Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple MyelomaSonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Boccadoro M, et al · N Engl J Med · 2024;390:301-313
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5
  6. 6
    Daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 CEPHEUS trialUsmani SZ, Facon T, Hungria V, et al · Nat Med · 2025;31:1195-1202
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4
  7. 7
    Cilta-cel in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-4): an updated analysis including overall survival from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trialEinsele H, San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, et al · Lancet Oncol · 2026;27:254-268
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3
  8. 8
    Teclistamab plus Daratumumab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple MyelomaCosta LJ, Bahlis NJ, Perrot A, et al · N Engl J Med · 2026;394:739-752
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4
  9. 9
    Daratumumab or Active Monitoring for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple MyelomaDimopoulos MA, Voorhees PM, Schjesvold F, et al · N Engl J Med · 2025;392:1777-1788
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2
  10. 10
    EHA-EMN Evidence-Based Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with multiple myelomaDimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Boccadoro M, et al · Nat Rev Clin Oncol · 2025;22:680-700
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4
  11. 11
    Consensus guidelines and recommendations for infection prevention in multiple myeloma: a report from the International Myeloma Working GroupRaje NS, Anaissie E, Kumar SK, Lonial S, Martin T, Gertz MA, et al · Lancet Haematol · 2022;9:e143-e161
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4

This page is based on reputable scientific sources and was last updated on 28 October 2026. The content of this website is for educational and informational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis or treatment by a specialist physician. Consult your treating physician about any treatment decision.