MSI-H or dMMR bowel cancer: immunotherapy instead of chemotherapy

A simple test on the tumour sample that, in about one in every 20 patients with bowel cancer that has spread, changes treatment from chemotherapy to immunotherapy

Updated: 28 October 20263 min read10 references
Show content for:

Key points

  • Every patient with bowel cancer should have the tumour's MMR or MSI status tested; the test is done on the same biopsy or surgical sample [1, 10].
  • In MSI-H disease that has spread, immunotherapy controlled the disease about twice as long as chemotherapy, with a third of the serious side effects [2].
  • Two immunotherapy drugs together had kept the disease quiet in most patients two years later; with chemotherapy, in only a few [4].
  • Before and after surgery too, immunotherapy has had unprecedented results in these tumours [6, 7, 8].

What do MSI-H and dMMR mean?

Every time cells divide they copy their DNA, and an "error-correction system" (MMR) fixes copying mistakes. In some bowel tumours this system is broken (dMMR); the result is thousands of mutations in the tumour, which show up on testing as "high microsatellite instability" (MSI-H). These mutations make the tumour look "more foreign" to the immune system; that is why immunotherapy works very well in them (immunotherapy and organ preservation).

Sometimes this fault is inherited (Lynch syndrome), and family testing is also needed [10] (is cancer hereditary?).

The story: when chemotherapy stepped aside

For years, the treatment of bowel cancer that had spread was, for every patient, chemotherapy with targeted drugs. Then a large study compared immunotherapy with pembrolizumab directly with chemotherapy in MSI-H patients: the disease got worse about twice as late, and serious side effects were a third of those with chemotherapy [2]. In those who responded, the response usually lasted for years [3].

A combination of two immunotherapy drugs (nivolumab and ipilimumab) went a step further: two years later the disease had stayed quiet in most patients; with chemotherapy, in only a few [4]. This combination was also better than nivolumab alone [5].

22 vs 66
In every 100 patients, serious side effects
Immunotherapy versus chemotherapy [2]
72 vs 14
In every 100 patients, disease controlled after 2 years
Two immunotherapy drugs versus chemotherapy [4]
68 in 100
Tumour completely gone in the surgical specimen
Short immunotherapy before surgery for colon cancer [6]

Before and after surgery

Colon cancer: a few weeks of immunotherapy before surgery destroyed the tumour completely in the surgical specimen in 68 of 100 patients [6]. After surgery for stage 3 disease, adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy roughly halved relapses [7].

Rectal cancer: in one study, 6 months of immunotherapy destroyed the tumour in every patient, without the need for radiotherapy or surgery [8], and in a larger report most patients also avoided surgery [9]. This approach still needs longer follow-up and an experienced centre.

The question to ask

If you have bowel cancer, ask: "Has my tumour been tested for MMR or MSI, and what was the result?" If your disease has spread and the tumour is MSI-H, ask about immunotherapy before starting chemotherapy [1, 2].

When should I call my doctor?

During immunotherapy, report diarrhoea or blood in the stool, a new cough or breathlessness, yellowing of the skin, severe tiredness or a widespread rash early; these may be immune-related inflammation that needs early treatment (side effects of immunotherapy).

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of bowel cancers are MSI-H?

In bowel cancer that has spread, a small group of patients (about 1 in 20) have such tumours; at earlier stages it is more common [1, 10].

Does immunotherapy help every bowel cancer?

No. In tumours with working MMR (most patients), immunotherapy alone usually does not work, and chemotherapy with targeted drugs is the main treatment [1].

How long does immunotherapy last?

In disease that has spread, usually up to 2 years [2]; before surgery, only a few weeks [6].

For physicians

Show detailsHide
For physicians

MMR (IHC) or MSI testing in every colorectal cancer [10, 1]. KEYNOTE-177: median PFS 16.5 versus 8.2 months (HR 0.60), grade ≥3 adverse events 22% versus 66% [2]; final OS HR 0.74 with 60% crossover [3]. CheckMate 8HW: nivolumab + ipilimumab first line, 24-month PFS 72% versus 14% (HR 0.21) [4]; versus nivolumab alone HR 0.62 [5]. NICHE-2: pCR 68%, pathological response 98% [6]. ATOMIC: atezolizumab + mFOLFOX6 in dMMR stage III, 3-year DFS 86.3% versus 76.2% (HR 0.50) [7]. Dostarlimab in dMMR rectal cancer: cCR 12 of 12 [8]; 49 of 49 in the rectal cohort [9]. Doses: pembrolizumab in MSI-H.

Scientific evidence

Show detailsHide

Scientific evidence

8 items
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer (KEYNOTE-177): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

The Lancet Oncology · 2022
44.5 monthsMedian follow-up in the final analysis
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Atezolizumab plus FOLFOX for Stage III Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer

N Engl J Med · 2026
86.3% vs 76.2%3-year disease-free survival
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

N Engl J Med · 2024
72% vs 14%24-month progression-free survival (first line)
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab in microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (CheckMate 8HW): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

The Lancet · 2025
HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.48–0.81)Progression-free survival (nivolumab + ipilimumab vs nivolumab, all lines)
Clinical trial · Phase 2

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer

N Engl J Med · 2024
113 of 115 patients (98%)Timely surgery
Clinical trial · Phase 2

Nonoperative Management of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors

N Engl J Med · 2025
49 of 49 patientsClinical complete response – rectal (cohort 1)
Clinical trial · Phase 3

Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal Cancer

N Engl J Med · 2020
16.5 vs 8.2 monthsMedian progression-free survival
Clinical trial · Phase 2

PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair-Deficient, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

N Engl J Med · 2022
12 of 12 patients (100%)Clinical complete response

Read more

Related cancer types

References

10 references
Show all references, 10 with a study cardClose the reference list

Numbers in the text, such as [1], refer to these sources. Sources with a “Study card” button are summarised in the site’s evidence library.

  1. 1
    Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upCremolini C, Chalabi M, Elez E, Fassan M, Gelli M, Goéré D, et al · Ann Oncol · 2026;37:759-776
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5
  2. 2
    Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal CancerAndré T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al · N Engl J Med · 2020;383:2207-2218
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5 6
  3. 3
    Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer (KEYNOTE-177): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 studyDiaz LA Jr, Shiu KK, Kim TW, Jensen BV, Jensen LH, Punt C, et al · Lancet Oncol · 2022;23:659-670
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2
  4. 4
    Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Metastatic Colorectal CancerAndré T, Elez E, Van Cutsem E, Jensen LH, Bennouna J, Mendez G, et al · N Engl J Med · 2024;391:2014-2026
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4
  5. 5
    Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab in microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (CheckMate 8HW): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trialAndré T, Elez E, Lenz HJ, Jensen LH, Touchefeu Y, Van Cutsem E, et al · Lancet · 2025;405:383-395
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2
  6. 6
    Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colon CancerChalabi M, Verschoor YL, Tan PB, Balduzzi S, Van Lent AU, Grootscholten C, et al · N Engl J Med · 2024;390:1949-1958
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4 5
  7. 7
    Atezolizumab plus FOLFOX for Stage III Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon CancerSinicrope FA, Ou FS, Arnold D, et al · N Engl J Med · 2026;394:1155-1166
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3
  8. 8
    PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair–Deficient, Locally Advanced Rectal CancerCercek A, Lumish M, Sinopoli J, Weiss J, Shia J, Lamendola-Essel M, et al · N Engl J Med · 2022;386:2363-2376
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3
  9. 9
    Nonoperative Management of Mismatch Repair–Deficient TumorsCercek A, Foote MB, Rousseau B, Smith JJ, Shia J, Sinopoli J, et al · N Engl J Med · 2025;392:2297-2308
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2
  10. 10
    Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upArgilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, et al · Ann Oncol · 2020;31:1291-1305
    Study cardDOIPubMed Back to text: 1 2 3 4

This page is based on reputable scientific sources and was last updated on 28 October 2026. The content of this website is for educational and informational purposes only and does not replace consultation, diagnosis or treatment by a specialist physician. Consult your treating physician about any treatment decision.